Capital Network Solutions, Inc Sacramento

What's a QR Code?



QR Code with contact information for Dave Murphy at Capital Network Solutions in Sacramento, California
Ok, so what is this crazy thing I've included in the blog today? Well, some of you in the tech world have been seeing these little codes on processors and other electronics and chips for a number of years now. This QR box is essentially my business card. If you have a QR code reader or QR reader enabled phone, you could take a snapshot of this and instantly have all my pertinent contact information. Want to generate your own QR code? A quick search on Google gives a number of QR code generators. We're likely to see more of these little buggers before too long as the Asian markets have already become inundated with them as advertisements and companies, such as Microsoft, have begun to include them on Xbox games and other media.

Centralis Harvester 4 makes large Citrix Farms easy to manage!

Making light work of even the most time-consuming farm management tasks, Centralis® Harvester™ is a highly cost-effective way to add value to your investment in Citrix Presentation Server.

Simplify Administration
Save hours on key tasks and remove the need for custom scripts by using Harvester to carry out complex tasks and make farm-wide changes in seconds.

Analyze, Report & Standardize key Farm settings
Find non-standard settings across Published Applications and Citrix Presentation Servers and correct them. Define a new standard and simply apply it across the farm.

Centralize server settings
Store your Citrix Presentation Server settings in a reference file, allowing you to accurately set a new server to standard in seconds – or check the settings of your existing servers.

Whether you are running audit reports, carrying out diagnostic checks or making farm-wide changes, Harvester enables administrators to carry out many vital farm management tasks much more quickly and easily - without the need for scripts.

"I upgrade our Citrix Farm regularly, and publish well over 700 applications. The amount of time I was able to save using the Centralis Harvester 4 product is incredible! I can publish hundreds of applications to a server in just a few minutes… Centralis Harvester 4 is an awesome tool that I would strongly recommend to anyone!"

– California Department of Parks and Recreation

http://www.centralis.co.uk/products/software/citrix/harvester.asp

Virtualization, "10 Minutes to Xen"

Virtualization took another step forward with Citrix's acquisition of XenSource. XenSource is a competitor to VMWare in a way that Microsoft Virtual Server is as well. XenSource is a fully matured virutalization product that installs quickly and offers similar access to SAN infrastructure and hardware clustering that VMWare ESX and Microsoft Virtual Server offer.

XenEnterprise supports IDE, SATA, SCSI, SAS, fiber based SANs, NFS NAS, iSCSI and boot to SAN for blades. Boot to SAN capability can dramatically cut down on the number of hard drives needed for an infrastructure by consolidating all storage needs into the SAN, rather than separate host OS disks which then facilitate access to the shared storage.

Hardware clustering is similar to the concept used in software clustering, however, managing the virtual environment is typically supported better by software vendors as the software does not have to function in failover modes required by services such as Microsoft Cluster Server.

For those interested in the open source community, the software is based on the industry standard Open Source Xen 3.1.

Maximum Return on Investment with VMWare

Return on Investment, (ROI) for short, is typically associated with financial benchmarks of capital investments within a business. ROI has also made inroads to describe the benefit or return an organization receives from technology expenditures, though efforts have often been tenuous in showing a true relation. So much frustration has surrounded ROI for IT projects and purchases that a number of books have been written to help describe the oft confusing term, such as "How to Measure Anything."

The purpose of this discussion is to peel open the curtains just a little, to shed light on the ROI of typical server purchases and how the ROI on core server equipment can be increased through the use of virtualization. Additionally, examples of how to go about judging return on investment will be described.

Return on investment for equipment purchases, specifically servers, can be viewed (simplistically) in one of two ways. The first way is to conclude 100% ROI when the server is purposed for a task, such as email. In this sense, because the server is dutifully doing its job of providing email to the organization, it has provided full return on investment. Calculating the ROI over time, might include subtracting any server downtime due to software or equipment failure or the server sitting in the closet waiting to be installed. The second option of calculating ROI comes from gathering measurements of system performance to conclude overall system utilization. Only with virtualization does the second method of measuring become truly evident.

The way these two philosophies differ is subtle. To be a bit cliche, I will illustrate with a car analogy. In one instance, I have the luxury of owning a Ferrari and take full gratification from owning the vehicle. I drive to and from work in my shiny, fast car and therefore, my ROI is 100%. Only if my Ferrari breaks down do I lose a return on my investment. In the other instance, I am the only person in the car, and I can only drive to work at 30 mph. Clearly, in the second case, owning the Ferrari doesn't make much sense. At the very least, if I were able to drive to work at 100 or 120 mph, it might be worth owning. If I can have another person or two in the car to share the cost of gas, I might really get some use out of it! However, because I commute in a crowded city, I will rarely, if ever have the chance to operate at those speeds.

Having a fast server, chugging away on corporate email, for many organizations is like having the Ferrari (high end server), but driving at 30 mph with one person in the car. In technical parlance, it's equivalent to using about 10% of server resources (hard drive space, CPU, memory). Does it make sense to have a server dedicated to a specific function when that function only utilizes such a small amount of available resources?

Where virtualization comes into play is that the technology allows organizations to find underutilized servers and add additional functions to them without compromising the integrity of those services. If there are two servers running at 20%, then more services can be added, like Sharepoint, anti-spam, anti-virus, backup or other needs, until the utilization rate hits 70-80%. Now at least, we're driving that Ferrari to work with two or more people at 80 mph.